God Hates Fags
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Couchtripper Forum Index -> News mash
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
eefanincan
Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mandy wrote:
I meant that the news is so full of real hurt and real injury, which ALSO leads to injury to feeling, that giving millions in damages for "just" injury to feelings is a sick joke.


I don't follow your logic. You keep saying "real hurt and real injury".... why is it that injury to feeling has to come after physical injury, or is any less important? "Just" injury to feelings really minimizes any emotional trauma that those individuals went through. It can be far more scarring than any physical injury and I fail to see why a monetary award for it is any less valid than an award for physical injuries. I can't agree with your statement of calling it a "sick joke."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nekokate



Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Location: West Yorkshire, UK

PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 3:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree - mental trauma is much worse than physical. I was bullied all through school and I would have given anything for them to just punch me everyday instead.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mandy



Joined: 07 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Skylace wrote:
Mandy wrote:
30% to 50% probably goes to lawyers if they were hired on a contingency basis, else if on a straight fee basis then probaly $100,000 - $1M would go to lawyers.

30% to 50%? Most lawyers in these cases take 60% to 80% depending on if they were paid before. That's why you even see the ads on TV "no fee unless you win". A lot of lawyers on these big cases will take a retainer fee (and not a large one) and then not be paid until after the case. So if you win, they take more than 50%.


Skylace, do you have any references or cases to substantiate 60-80%

My contention is supported by http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-article-a-1590-m-1-sc-11-typical_legal_fee_arrangements-i

which says contingency fees are typically one third.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mandy



Joined: 07 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 4:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

eefanincan wrote:
Mandy wrote:
I meant that the news is so full of real hurt and real injury, which ALSO leads to injury to feeling, that giving millions in damages for "just" injury to feelings is a sick joke.


I don't follow your logic. You keep saying "real hurt and real injury".... why is it that injury to feeling has to come after physical injury, or is any less important? "Just" injury to feelings really minimizes any emotional trauma that those individuals went through. It can be far more scarring than any physical injury and I fail to see why a monetary award for it is any less valid than an award for physical injuries. I can't agree with your statement of calling it a "sick joke."


If the damages of $10m is justified for the person who sued, then damages of $100M+ is justified for people who had BOTH physical and mental injury. The British soldiers only got £100,000 (less lawyer's fees) each on average .. that is RACISM.

That is why this damages amount is a JOKE .. it is an insult to everyone who is a minority (or a non-US citizen) who interacts with the US justice system
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nekokate



Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Location: West Yorkshire, UK

PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mandy wrote:
If the damages of $10m is justified for the person who sued, then damages of $100M+ is justified for people who had BOTH physical and mental injury. The British soldiers only got £100,000 (less lawyer's fees) each on average .. that is RACISM.


Calm down, I don't think "Soldier" is a race yet.

"Is it 'cos I is Soldierish?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Skylace
Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mandy wrote:
Skylace wrote:
Mandy wrote:
30% to 50% probably goes to lawyers if they were hired on a contingency basis, else if on a straight fee basis then probaly $100,000 - $1M would go to lawyers.

30% to 50%? Most lawyers in these cases take 60% to 80% depending on if they were paid before. That's why you even see the ads on TV "no fee unless you win". A lot of lawyers on these big cases will take a retainer fee (and not a large one) and then not be paid until after the case. So if you win, they take more than 50%.


Skylace, do you have any references or cases to substantiate 60-80%

My contention is supported by http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-article-a-1590-m-1-sc-11-typical_legal_fee_arrangements-i

which says contingency fees are typically one third.

Not cases that would be online but my father worked closely with lawyers and I know quite a few. They take a big chunk of the money. That is why you hear about a lot of people walking out of cases with not much because of legal fees.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eefanincan
Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nekokate wrote:

Calm down, I don't think "Soldier" is a race yet.


A good point, kate!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faceless
admin


Joined: 25 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote



Good stuff - the more nutters who are refused platforms the better.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SpursFan1902
Pitch Queen


Joined: 24 May 2007
Location: Sunshine State

PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Too bad they can't be banned from comming back. But, in fairness, they have the right to believe what they want and I have the right not to agree and not to listen. They are offensive to be sure and I think that they are quite possibly insane, but I don't have to agree with them, I just have to have a remote to change the channel or a window to close so that I don't hear them. If they start hurting people, then they should be killed...oh,..urm, I mean stopped.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Skylace
Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SpursFan1902 wrote:
Too bad they can't be banned from comming back. But, in fairness, they have the right to believe what they want and I have the right not to agree and not to listen. They are offensive to be sure and I think that they are quite possibly insane, but I don't have to agree with them, I just have to have a remote to change the channel or a window to close so that I don't hear them. If they start hurting people, then they should be killed...oh,..urm, I mean stopped.

Couldn't have said it better myself thumbs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faceless
admin


Joined: 25 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What if they're standing outside your house waving their banners and hurling abuse at your family whenever they go outside?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Skylace
Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's harassment and something totally different then being able to change a channel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faceless
admin


Joined: 25 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

But that's exactly the type of thing that these people do. And that's why I'm glad they've been banned.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Skylace
Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm glad they have been banned as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SpursFan1902
Pitch Queen


Joined: 24 May 2007
Location: Sunshine State

PostPosted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't get me wrong...I am glad they have been banned as well. If you notice the first line of my post is "Too bad they can't be banned from coming back". I don't wnat them here anymore than you guys want them, but they have the right to their own opinion. As to the question of them abusing my family in my front yard...well, I would be posting from jail after kicking their a$$e$. They can have their own opinion, but in my front yard, their own opinion is what ever I tell them it is!! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Couchtripper Forum Index -> News mash All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Couchtripper - 2005-2015