Maryland immunisation scandal

serious, weird or whatever - it's up to you
Post Reply
User avatar
faceless Online
Posts: 26468
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Maryland immunisation scandal

Post by faceless »

(NewsTarget) Following the State of Maryland's threats against parents who refuse to have their children vaccinated, children were herded into a Price George County courthouse being guarded by armed personnel with attack dogs. Inside, the children were forcibly vaccinated, many against their will, under orders from the State Attorney General, various State Judges and the local School Board Director, all of whom illegally conspired to threaten parents with imprisonment if they did not submit their children to vaccinations.

The State of Maryland has now turned to Gestapo tactics to force its medical will upon the People, stripping parents of any right to decide how they wish to protect their own children from infectious disease. Health authorities there have already announced their intent to essentially kidnap parents and throw them in jail, removing them from their children for up to thirty days if they continue to refuse to have their children vaccinated. This will all be conducted at gunpoint, with armed personnel and attack dogs at the ready, making sure nobody steps out of line, and suppressing any attempt at public dissent against the Orwellian vaccination policies.

The entire campaign against these parents is blatantly illegal. There is no law in Maryland requiring the vaccination of children, thus parents who refuse to do so may not be legally charged with violating any law. Instead, Maryland health and school authorities are using Gestapo-like tactics, threatening to charge the parents with child truancy violations, criminalizing them for daring to protect their children from the dangerous chemicals found in vaccines (including thimerosal, a chemical additive containing a neurotoxic form of mercury).

https://www.newstarget.com/022267.html

----------------------

I'm not sure if this story is entirely true, but if it is it's pretty shocking.
User avatar
Skylace
Admin
Posts: 9852
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post by Skylace »

CLICK HERE
So far this is what I have found on it.
User avatar
pirtybirdy
'Native New Yorker'
Posts: 2829
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:33 pm
Location: FL USA
Contact:

Re: Maryland immunisation scandal

Post by pirtybirdy »

faceless wrote:(NewsTarget) Following the State of Maryland's threats against parents who refuse to have their children vaccinated, children were herded into a Price George County courthouse being guarded by armed personnel with attack dogs. Inside, the children were forcibly vaccinated, many against their will, under orders from the State Attorney General, various State Judges and the local School Board Director, all of whom illegally conspired to threaten parents with imprisonment if they did not submit their children to vaccinations.

The State of Maryland has now turned to Gestapo tactics to force its medical will upon the People, stripping parents of any right to decide how they wish to protect their own children from infectious disease. Health authorities there have already announced their intent to essentially kidnap parents and throw them in jail, removing them from their children for up to thirty days if they continue to refuse to have their children vaccinated. This will all be conducted at gunpoint, with armed personnel and attack dogs at the ready, making sure nobody steps out of line, and suppressing any attempt at public dissent against the Orwellian vaccination policies.

The entire campaign against these parents is blatantly illegal. There is no law in Maryland requiring the vaccination of children, thus parents who refuse to do so may not be legally charged with violating any law. Instead, Maryland health and school authorities are using Gestapo-like tactics, threatening to charge the parents with child truancy violations, criminalizing them for daring to protect their children from the dangerous chemicals found in vaccines (including thimerosal, a chemical additive containing a neurotoxic form of mercury).

https://www.newstarget.com/022267.html

----------------------

I'm not sure if this story is entirely true, but if it is it's pretty shocking.
Who wrote this story? Sounds like a real nutter with an agenda with all those key words used by the usual wackadoodles. I don't particularly like the fact that they make laws to force people to get vaccinations, but what I read from other articles, one can opt out for a medical or religious reason. I know some parents rather take a chance not to vaccinate their children in the slight minute chance they might be allergic, but I think they should be left to deal with it if that's what they choose. Even if their kid gets polio or the mumps, it won't pass it on to my kid, 'cause it'll be immunized.
User avatar
Skylace
Admin
Posts: 9852
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: Maryland immunisation scandal

Post by Skylace »

pirtybirdy wrote:
faceless wrote:(NewsTarget) Following the State of Maryland's threats against parents who refuse to have their children vaccinated, children were herded into a Price George County courthouse being guarded by armed personnel with attack dogs. Inside, the children were forcibly vaccinated, many against their will, under orders from the State Attorney General, various State Judges and the local School Board Director, all of whom illegally conspired to threaten parents with imprisonment if they did not submit their children to vaccinations.

The State of Maryland has now turned to Gestapo tactics to force its medical will upon the People, stripping parents of any right to decide how they wish to protect their own children from infectious disease. Health authorities there have already announced their intent to essentially kidnap parents and throw them in jail, removing them from their children for up to thirty days if they continue to refuse to have their children vaccinated. This will all be conducted at gunpoint, with armed personnel and attack dogs at the ready, making sure nobody steps out of line, and suppressing any attempt at public dissent against the Orwellian vaccination policies.

The entire campaign against these parents is blatantly illegal. There is no law in Maryland requiring the vaccination of children, thus parents who refuse to do so may not be legally charged with violating any law. Instead, Maryland health and school authorities are using Gestapo-like tactics, threatening to charge the parents with child truancy violations, criminalizing them for daring to protect their children from the dangerous chemicals found in vaccines (including thimerosal, a chemical additive containing a neurotoxic form of mercury).

https://www.newstarget.com/022267.html

----------------------

I'm not sure if this story is entirely true, but if it is it's pretty shocking.
Who wrote this story? Sounds like a real nutter with an agenda with all those key words used by the usual wackadoodles. I don't particularly like the fact that they make laws to force people to get vaccinations, but what I read from other articles, one can opt out for a medical or religious reason. I know some parents rather take a chance not to vaccinate their children in the slight minute chance they might be allergic, but I think they should be left to deal with it if that's what they choose. Even if their kid gets polio or the mumps, it won't pass it on to my kid, 'cause it'll be immunized.
If you watch the click from CNN that I posted you'll see that the article seems to be blown way out of proportion to what actually happened.
User avatar
eefanincan
Admin
Posts: 6646
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 5:05 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Maryland immunisation scandal

Post by eefanincan »

pirtybirdy wrote: Who wrote this story? Sounds like a real nutter with an agenda with all those key words used by the usual wackadoodles. I don't particularly like the fact that they make laws to force people to get vaccinations, but what I read from other articles, one can opt out for a medical or religious reason. I know some parents rather take a chance not to vaccinate their children in the slight minute chance they might be allergic, but I think they should be left to deal with it if that's what they choose. Even if their kid gets polio or the mumps, it won't pass it on to my kid, 'cause it'll be immunized.
You're right pirty, I think this person really blew things out of proportion. But on your point of your child being immunized --- remember that vaccines aren't all 100 % effective. I totally agree though that people should have the right to refuse based on medical or religious beliefs, but there should be appropriate documentation.

The general problem with unvaccinated children though is that if they become ill, they could pass it on to others---- even children/adults who are vaccinated on a regular schedule. Vaccines can wear off after a number of years, so if you're at the "end" of a timespan and need to get a booster shot, you could be susceptible (thankfully, you likely wouldn't get as severely ill as you should have developed some immunity).

The other thing to consider is that it they often find out that certain batches of vaccines are ineffect---- usually only after a number of people who've received the vaccine become ill. (I got Pertussis that way).

So vaccines aren't perfect..... and that leads to this kind of debate.
User avatar
Kezza
Gone To The Dogs!
Posts: 1407
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 7:46 pm

Post by Kezza »

I have several co-workers with kids enrolled in Prince George's County, Maryland schools. The "debate" mentioned by eefan is certainly a volatile one, especially when vaccines are new. I can't blame parents for not wanting their children to be guinea pigs, only to discover that, years down the road, these vaccines may cause other, yet undiscovered, illnesses.
Post Reply