I've heard of a similar case happening a lot closer to home. The lady set off the airport metal detector in that case too.
You'd think the 1st thing they teach you in surgery school is to count the large, sharp instruments BEFORE sewing up the patient. But what do I know? I never went to university for 7 years.
It's not small, either if you look at it relative to his pelvis and spine. Geeez!!! I hope they never left anything in me after I had my appendix out. Although, I've been through enough airport security in the 20 years since that I'm sure if they had it would have been discovered by now. He he he.
IRiSHMaFIA wrote:Only £53,000? He should have got a hell of a lot more than that.
I wonder how it was possible for that to be left in the mans body? The surgeon was obviously a complete imbecile.
How much should he have got then? The regulation 345,678,910 dollars that people tend to sue for? I know people who have lost legs to get less than £53,000.
IRiSHMaFIA wrote:Only £53,000? He should have got a hell of a lot more than that.
I wonder how it was possible for that to be left in the mans body? The surgeon was obviously a complete imbecile.
How much should he have got then? The regulation 345,678,910 dollars that people tend to sue for? I know people who have lost legs to get less than £53,000.
£53,001 atleast
I'm actually not a fan of people suing others but since it's obvious negligence on the part of someone you put so much faith in. I feel he should be taken for everything he can. For something like that to be left inside a patient is a horrid neglect for their well being. I'm sure the surgeon had his mind on his last golf score.
IRiSHMaFIA wrote:Only £53,000? He should have got a hell of a lot more than that.
I wonder how it was possible for that to be left in the mans body? The surgeon was obviously a complete imbecile.
How much should he have got then? The regulation 345,678,910 dollars that people tend to sue for? I know people who have lost legs to get less than £53,000.
£53,001 atleast
I'm actually not a fan of people suing others but since it's obvious negligence on the part of someone you put so much faith in. I feel he should be taken for everything he can. For something like that to be left inside a patient is a horrid neglect for their well being. I'm sure the surgeon had his mind on his last golf score.
Actually, it's the nurses and OR techs who should hold some of the blame as well since they would have been obviously aware that this was there and not removed---- but of course, we might not be getting the whole story,
IRiSHMaFIA wrote:Only £53,000? He should have got a hell of a lot more than that.
I wonder how it was possible for that to be left in the mans body? The surgeon was obviously a complete imbecile.
How much should he have got then? The regulation 345,678,910 dollars that people tend to sue for? I know people who have lost legs to get less than £53,000.
£53,001 atleast
I'm actually not a fan of people suing others but since it's obvious negligence on the part of someone you put so much faith in. I feel he should be taken for everything he can. For something like that to be left inside a patient is a horrid neglect for their well being. I'm sure the surgeon had his mind on his last golf score.
Actually, it's the nurses and OR techs who should hold some of the blame as well since they would have been obviously aware that this was there and not removed---- but of course, we might not be getting the whole story,
Good point....so the nurse had her mind on the techs arse and the surgeon on his golf game so sack the lot of them and take their homes and raid their bank accounts! Messin I just felt like letting loose.