Harry's Place libelling Kevin Ovenden

Politics for the non-conservative...
Post Reply
User avatar
faceless
Posts: 26472
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Harry's Place libelling Kevin Ovenden

Post by faceless »

[web]https://www.hurryupharry.org/2010/03/16/ ... n-ovenden/[/web]

I left a comment on there last night pointing out that if some passer-by had read the 'joke' they wouldn't necessarily have known if it was a 'joke', thereby supporting the libel claim, and that the fact that the twat who posted it went there deliberately to cause trouble would show him in a bad light to any judge. They didn't allow it through.

The pricks that take part in that site all seem to me to be the worst kind of commentators - they latch onto anything they can in order to attack anything which questions their own 'right' to be pricks. They don't actually give a fuck about any of it. The fact that they have that cliched expression 'Liberty, if it means anything is the right to tell people what they don't want to hear' in their site logo supports this idea. And the fact they won't publish things that their own rabid prick members wouldn't want to hear shows it to be nothing more than a pile of hypocrite shite.

Harry's Place - run by cunts for cunts.
User avatar
faceless
Posts: 26472
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Post by faceless »

It looks like their site's gone down - maybe that's because George Galloway is now suing him too!

https://www.hurryupharry.org/2010/03/18/ ... -galloway/

Considering the long-term and constant reliance that David T has on posting stories regarding GG there's an almost Karmic quality about it.
User avatar
faceless
Posts: 26472
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Post by faceless »

[align=center]<object width="480" height="360"><param name="movie" value="https://www.dailymotion.com/swf/video/xb ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="https://www.dailymotion.com/swf/video/xbuio9" width="480" height="360" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed>[/align]

Here's David Toube at some meeting recently. He's a troll by any definition. His smug and aggressive body language says a lot more than his shrill words (whatever they were because it made little sense to me).
reject
admin
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 5:56 pm

Post by reject »

What a t^^T... so wished i had of been there... they were ever so politite to the prick...
Guess Irish guys think differently
:-)
mickyv
admin
Posts: 488
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 5:25 pm

Post by mickyv »

For about a two week period I had fun in posting at HP, mainly baiting them by pointing out their hypocritical views; the best fun was had by getting in a few good insults, especially at Oliver Kamm, who sometimes posts there also.

However since the Gaza massacre, I just can’t bring myself to engage in any way with people who call themselves the "Decent Left", and who claim to advocate military “humanitarian interventions” in order to protect innocent civilian lives, hence their self-declared support for the attacks against Yugoslavia & Iraq etc. However during the two week slaughter of mainly innocent civilians in Gaza, they not only did not call for any action to stop the slaughter, but instead defended Israel’s murderous killing spree. It was obvious that for them, when it comes to Palestinians, there are no innocent civilians, and that all opponents of Israel's crimes deserve ruthless annihilation, and by extension that includes people like me, for if they are so fanatically deranged that they can justify in their minds the use of white phosphorus to burn children to death, then they can & will justify anything against all critics of Israeli crimes.

Ever since then I feel that I will be soiling myself by posting at HP again, a place as so rightly described by Faceless as a place “run by cunts for cunts.”
modern
admin
Posts: 522
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:00 am

Post by modern »

To be honest, I don't really know much about 'arry's place. But from what you have wrote mickyv, it seems like these 'elighteners' deserve eveything that hopefully get from any lawsuit against them.
User avatar
faceless
Posts: 26472
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Post by faceless »

Here's another story about this Toube character.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ssion.html

He's really just a busybody prick. It comes as no surprise to know he's a corporate lawyer - who would choose such a soulless occupation?
User avatar
Colston
admin
Posts: 739
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:45 pm

Post by Colston »

mickyv wrote:For about a two week period I had fun in posting at HP, mainly baiting them by pointing out their hypocritical views; the best fun was had by getting in a few good insults, especially at Oliver Kamm, who sometimes posts there also.

However since the Gaza massacre, I just can’t bring myself to engage in any way with people who call themselves the "Decent Left", and who claim to advocate military “humanitarian interventions” in order to protect innocent civilian lives, hence their self-declared support for the attacks against Yugoslavia & Iraq etc. However during the two week slaughter of mainly innocent civilians in Gaza, they not only did not call for any action to stop the slaughter, but instead defended Israel’s murderous killing spree. It was obvious that for them, when it comes to Palestinians, there are no innocent civilians, and that all opponents of Israel's crimes deserve ruthless annihilation, and by extension that includes people like me, for if they are so fanatically deranged that they can justify in their minds the use of white phosphorus to burn children to death, then they can & will justify anything against all critics of Israeli crimes.

Ever since then I feel that I will be soiling myself by posting at HP again, a place as so rightly described by Faceless as a place “run by cunts for cunts.”
My old Professor Norman Geras is lumped in with this lot. I can't read some of his blog.
User avatar
faceless
Posts: 26472
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Post by faceless »

colston, can you not quote more than 100 characters at a time? It messes up the front page of the site. ta
Post Reply