Italian bloke freezes on TV

seshme · Post by **seshme** » Thu Nov 06, 2008 1:49 pm

Seriously this guy is an absolute horror, you should read up on him.

Post by **faceless** » Thu Nov 06, 2008 1:54 pm

This is a google tranlsation of a report about the story -

"Perhaps someone did not care that I'm always pale. I felt a little 'tired during a broadcast. Then you and 'spread the voice that I was unconscious, even dead. Take it as an omen: Up to late last night I received phone calls of people who welcomes the fact that it was not true. "

It's uncertain at this time whether the garbledness is down to a stroke or google.

Brown Sauce · Post by **Brown Sauce** » Thu Nov 06, 2008 2:35 pm

seshme wrote:So you would wish harm on someone who is implementing Bush's huge aid package to Africa but are against it for a mafia owned politician?

got any details on this "aid" package ?

seshme · Post by **seshme** » Thu Nov 06, 2008 3:34 pm

Far be it for me to me to be giving support to Bush of all people but for what it's worth

[web]https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 00941.html[/web]

Brown Sauce · Post by **Brown Sauce** » Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:37 pm

then you should listen to this,

https://www.couchtripper.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?t=8845

as the man said, "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch" ...

JWDread · Post by **JWDread** » Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:29 pm

I just thought it all funny .

ItzMeRon · Post by **ItzMeRon** » Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:17 pm

faceless wrote:answering a question with a question is corrupt...

.............................................What? Surely you do not mean that faceless.

Post by **faceless** » Sat Nov 08, 2008 1:56 am

do you want me to answer that or should I just ask a question and avoid answering you?

It's a get-out trick ... and therefore a corruption of truth.

ItzMeRon · Post by **ItzMeRon** » Sat Nov 08, 2008 2:36 am

It is not always a get-out trick. I do not know that it is even sometimes. In fact, I teach using the Socratic method all the time.

I am sure there are those people who abuse this way of teaching or getting down to the bottom of a topic....but in no way do I see it corrupt. And if I did, I would not be teaching childern that way. Perhaps they all learn by means of corruption when I use the Socratic method?

Post by **faceless** » Sat Nov 08, 2008 2:41 am

Why should I answer that?

Post by **Skylace** » Sat Nov 08, 2008 2:50 am

ItzMeRon wrote:It is not always a get-out trick. I do not know that it is even sometimes. In fact, I teach using the Socratic method all the time.

I am sure there are those people who abuse this way of teaching or getting down to the bottom of a topic....but in no way do I see it corrupt. And if I did, I would not be teaching childern that way. Perhaps they all learn by means of corruption when I use the Socratic method?

Who do you teach? I thought you said you were an IT guy.