Obama's Race Speech ......
-
Aja
- Reggae Ambassador
- Posts: 2070
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 2:30 pm
- Location: Lost Londoner ..Nr Philly. PA
Obama's Race Speech ......
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/pWe7wTVbLUU&hl ... ram><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/pWe7wTVbLUU&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/1 ... 92077.html
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/1 ... 92077.html
There was a tiny part of this speech I didn't care for much, but only a tiny part. When he talked about people blaming the trouble on "our stalwart allies such as Israel rather than radical Islamist extremism"
But without saying shit like that, he would have no chance of becoming the president, so it's all good. He's the best candidate, even if he's not perfect.
But without saying shit like that, he would have no chance of becoming the president, so it's all good. He's the best candidate, even if he's not perfect.
As you said...You can't have everything 
I think this is an issue with the Liberal left in a more general sense, in that we lack the same cohesive spirit of those on the right, who will put aside small qualms to at least after elections. We tend to sacrifice 8 out of 10 things that will be better to protest against the two things that aren't. Of course, this can be a good thing in an idealist world, but in real-politik it is somewhat of a hindrance.
I think this is an issue with the Liberal left in a more general sense, in that we lack the same cohesive spirit of those on the right, who will put aside small qualms to at least after elections. We tend to sacrifice 8 out of 10 things that will be better to protest against the two things that aren't. Of course, this can be a good thing in an idealist world, but in real-politik it is somewhat of a hindrance.
That's exactly how I view the world. The Left's main obstacle is its honesty. Right-wingers prosper because they don't care about lying and bending truths to suit them. The Left, or at least MY Left, is obsessed with the truth no matter how harmful to our own cause. That's why I never try and "spin" things Galloway says if I disagree, or indeed why I never try and spin world events when they don't suit my politics.til661 wrote:As you said...You can't have everything
I think this is an issue with the Liberal left in a more general sense, in that we lack the same cohesive spirit of those on the right, who will put aside small qualms to at least after elections. We tend to sacrifice 8 out of 10 things that will be better to protest against the two things that aren't. Of course, this can be a good thing in an idealist world, but in real-politik it is somewhat of a hindrance.
I call a spade a spade (at the same time as flicking it out of my deck of cards and into the eye of the nearest neo-con) :p
*Puts on Devil's Advocate hat*nekokate wrote:That's exactly how I view the world. The Left's main obstacle is its honesty. Right-wingers prosper because they don't care about lying and bending truths to suit them. The Left, or at least MY Left, is obsessed with the truth no matter how harmful to our own cause. That's why I never try and "spin" things Galloway says if I disagree, or indeed why I never try and spin world events when they don't suit my politics.
I call a spade a spade (at the same time as flicking it out of my deck of cards and into the eye of the nearest neo-con) :p
I'm not sure I'd go that far. There are plenty of people on the right who are sincere in their beliefs and plenty on the left who aren't. It's more about individuals and about the broader ideas of ideology. We just don't have as unified an ideology - one that the 'left' subscribes to.
Take the American Movement Conservatives - While being a variety of disparate and competing groups they allied with each other to achieve power and thus enact their own particular agenda. I don't see the same level of co-operation on the left.
Hopefully Mr. Obama can be that man in the US, now we just need one over here, without the messianic craziness of our previous version Mr. Blair
But the left is a far wider spectrum - because it's, in essence, the rich against the poor. There's a lot more of the 'poor', so therefore more of a divide, whereas the 'rich' have at their heart the protection of their money and will close ranks to protect it.
Some of the left would happily become the right if they had the money, and I'm sure a lot of the right would be happy with a more social situation if they accepted that the understanding they've received is not correct.
Meanwhile in utopia...
Some of the left would happily become the right if they had the money, and I'm sure a lot of the right would be happy with a more social situation if they accepted that the understanding they've received is not correct.
Meanwhile in utopia...
-
major.tom
- Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
- Posts: 1990
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 7:07 pm
- Location: BC, Canada
But the right side of the spectrum is not the exclusive domain of the rich. I know many working-class folks who are right-wing, anti-union, or care more about sports than what's happening in the ~75% of the world that is populated by people who aren't European descendants.
I blame the media and our schools. We don't really learn history except in neatly packaged sound-bites. But sometimes these opinions are just handed down from parents to children. So it's a difficult cycle to break out of.
I blame the media and our schools. We don't really learn history except in neatly packaged sound-bites. But sometimes these opinions are just handed down from parents to children. So it's a difficult cycle to break out of.