At home with Israelis and Palestinians

[major.tom]

[web]https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/f ... 120693.stm[/web]

---
I found this article so irritating, it prompted to register the following complaint:

I was very disappointed by this article purportedly on the so-called peace negotiations taking place in Annapolis. Almost devoid of meaningful content, it still manages to be biased toward the Israeli subjects while giving short shrift to the Palestinians.

The opening salvo ("Following the Middle East peace conference in the US city of Annapolis, most Israelis and Palestinians yearn for a resolution that will allow them to live normal, peaceful lives.") leads one to think the article will actually discuss the issues of peace, justice, or even Annapolis. But none of them are mentioned. The author admits in the final paragraph that, "We did not speak about Annapolis or the peace process at either meal but I left both thinking..." So despite the introduction, he isn't actually concerned with discussing the opinions of Israeli's or Palestinians so much as his own.

What's worse, in between, the author takes time and care emphasizing the small pleasures of living in a (presumably illegal) Jewish "settlement," while his account of Palestinian life focuses heavily on petty details such as what dishes were served and (so briefly you almost miss it) the family's size.

The Israeli "settlement" is full of life and colour. He carefully notes how the Jewish Sabbath is a period of "pause and reflection." He relishes little pleasures such as "cheerful singing," the smile of "a Moroccan Jew with his son on his lap," his [host's] three-year-old daughter playing with a Slinky, and "warm, loving family banter and prayers and [again] singing."

This contrasts heavily to the utter lack of detail he provides of Palestinian life (aside from the previously-mentioned menu and head count). The only personal comments the author makes about his hosts rest heavily on a ten-year-old boy's "delight" at the author's prowess at chess or Uno.

As a story providing depth or insight into conflicting views, this article falls terribly short. But even in the very limited context of providing a window into the lives of Israelis and Palestinians, the author's bias is clear.

[faceless]

Good stuff Major, but will they publish it?

[major.tom]

I'm not so much interested in them publishing it. I just wish we would get real insight, context and balance in the press. This article is devoid of all three. Perhaps writing them will nudge them in the right direction.

[luke]

nice one major

i doubt you'll even get a reply though, i hope you do - i've complained to the bbc on articles before ( the last time on the nick giffin / 'free speech' debate ) and not once have even received acknowledgment that they've received it - let alone one trying to explain

they do deal with some though, you get to see some on the medialens board - some of their responses will boggle your mind!

i'm getting ready to start complaining again tomorrow - you know the anti chavez propaganda will be in full flow!

[Mandy]

major, That's excellent. Well done on your complaint & letting us know.

Tempted to mention you should cc / tell https://www.medialens.org and/or https://www.arabmediawatch.com

[major.tom]

Thanks for the suggestion, Mandy. I'll check out those websites and see if there's a way to contribute.