Alex Jones to be interviewed on TalkSport ?

Strangeness abounds...
User avatar
Mandy
admin
Posts: 2551
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:38 pm

Alex Jones to be interviewed on TalkSport ?

Post by Mandy »

On Friday night I heard on TalkSport that Alex Jones is going to be interviewed soon on TS. Can't recall on which show it would be, but likely to be James Whale (since he interviewed David Icke)
User avatar
faceless
Posts: 26747
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Post by faceless »

Whale did mention it the other night while Icke was on. I got the feeling it would be the middle of next week sometime.
User avatar
Mandy
admin
Posts: 2551
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:38 pm

Post by Mandy »

Great .. thanks faceless for the confirmation.
User avatar
Brown Sauce
admin
Posts: 1469
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 3:40 pm

Post by Brown Sauce »

it's tuesday night.
User avatar
luke
admin
Posts: 5626
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: by the sea

Post by luke »

is he supposed to be on tonight?
User avatar
faceless
Posts: 26747
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Post by faceless »

I'd forgotten about this, and just turned over. Hopefully he'll be on after 11 and we've not missed it.
User avatar
luke
admin
Posts: 5626
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: by the sea

Post by luke »

he had hazel blears on when i switched on!
User avatar
luke
admin
Posts: 5626
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: by the sea

Post by luke »

he's on now!
User avatar
faceless
Posts: 26747
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Post by faceless »

ah bugger, I can't change channel until 10:30

Whale said last night that he'd be on Thursday.
User avatar
luke
admin
Posts: 5626
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: by the sea

Post by luke »

don't worry i'm recording it, although i've missed the start - but i'm sure full recordings of it will be around
User avatar
faceless
Posts: 26747
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Post by faceless »

so, let's check some of Jones' facts so far.

1. Greenpeace are run by the Bilderberg people in order to make people scared about climate change.

2. They've been putting mercury in vaccines.

3. America proposed and funded the Chinese governments' 'one child' policy.
User avatar
luke
admin
Posts: 5626
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: by the sea

Post by luke »

another one that i wanna check;

15000 american troops have died from the iraq war that aren't counted in the main figures - because they died outside iraq afterwards

that would put the total at nearly 19000
User avatar
faceless
Posts: 26747
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Post by faceless »

ok, on a quick check, the first response on google to the mercury/vaccines situation is this:

'Thimerosal is a mercury-containing preservative used in some vaccines and other products since the 1930s. There is no convincing scientific evidence of harm caused by the low doses of thimerosal in vaccines, except for minor reactions like redness and swelling at the injection site. However, in July 1999, the Public Health Service agencies, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and vaccine manufacturers agreed that thimerosal should be reduced or eliminated in vaccines as a precautionary measure."
- source.

On wikipedia it states that Thimerosal prevented many deaths from Staphylococcus infection and cites a case where a comparison was made. It also says that the compound is 49% mercury, which is a lot, but I've not yet seen an actual amount as part of the whole vaccine.

considering Jones' point is all about global population reduction it seems odd they'd come up with something that prevented deaths in far more cases than it could perceivably cause.
User avatar
luke
admin
Posts: 5626
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: by the sea

Post by luke »

sorry, i messed up the recording - its all blank :oops:
User avatar
faceless
Posts: 26747
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Post by faceless »

haha, no worries - I got most of it anyway...

https://www.humyo.com/F/44907201/EMBED

I was just looking for info on the 'one-child' policy in China and this page suggests that it didn't actually affect population at all. And that it was introduced after the natural birthrate had already dropped significantly.
Post Reply