Cervical cancer vaccine required

serious, weird or whatever - it's up to you
User avatar
Marcella-FL
Don't make me pull this van over!!!
Posts: 1142
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:53 pm
Location: KMC, Germany

Post by Marcella-FL »

If they had a shot to prevent breast or testicular cancer would they reject that too?
User avatar
maycm
'cheeky banana'
Posts: 1671
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:47 pm

Post by maycm »

I'm betting there will come a day when someone catches a disease such as this and when they find out that their parent refused to let them have a vaccine they will be saying

"WTF? you knew there was something out there that could have prevented this but refused based on some misguided principal? Now I'm going to die for your principals? See you court mum"
User avatar
Mandy
admin
Posts: 2550
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:38 pm

Post by Mandy »

I am also betting there will come a day when a child is harmed by the vaccine and they will be saying :

"You gave me a vaccine without informing me of the possible side-effects. See you in court"

As an aside, a caller to the GG show last night said the cost per jab for UK taxpayers is around double the cost of jabs in the US.

This is a scandal.
User avatar
eefanincan
Admin
Posts: 6646
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 5:05 pm
Location: Canada

Post by eefanincan »

Marcella-FL wrote:If they had a shot to prevent breast or testicular cancer would they reject that too?
Probably not. I think the holdback for a lot of people is that this prevents a sexually transmitted type of infection and some people just can't deal with the thoughts that their children might be having sex let alone the fact that they might acquire some disease. Certainly not my perspective, but I know for many, it is. I wish more people would see the benefits.
User avatar
Skylace
Admin
Posts: 9852
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post by Skylace »

eefanincan wrote:
Marcella-FL wrote:If they had a shot to prevent breast or testicular cancer would they reject that too?
Probably not. I think the holdback for a lot of people is that this prevents a sexually transmitted type of infection and some people just can't deal with the thoughts that their children might be having sex let alone the fact that they might acquire some disease. Certainly not my perspective, but I know for many, it is. I wish more people would see the benefits.
I totally agree. It does seem so silly that they are rejected it on this fact.
Post Reply