Dead Man Confesses to Being 9/11 Mastermind

serious, weird or whatever - it's up to you
Post Reply
User avatar
Karl
admin
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:43 pm
Location: Tottenham

Dead Man Confesses to Being 9/11 Mastermind

Post by Karl »

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed: Dead Man Confesses to Being 9/11 Mastermind

According to news reports, alleged al-Qaeda "mastermind" Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has now confessed to having planned the 9/11 attacks. Last Saturday (March 10), he supposedly told a tribunal panel of three military officers and a government-provided representative: "I was responsible for the 9/11 operation, from A to Z. I was the operational director for Sheikh Osama bin Laden for the organising, planning, follow-up and execution of the 9/11 operation." This was not all. In fact, he supposedly confessed (though not under oath) to involvement in a total of 31 attacks or planned attacks, including the 1993 WTC bombing and the 2002 Bali bombing.

However, there is one rather large problem with this story: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was reportedly killed on September 11, 2002, during an hours-long shootout with Pakistani security forces. Intelligence officials had supposedly tracked him down to an apartment in the southern part of Karachi. FBI and Pakistani ISI officials then surrounded the building, and were joined by hundreds of police vehicles and Pakistan Rangers.

The subsequent sequence of events that culminated in Mohammed's death has been reconstructed by the Asia Times Online, based upon reports from the Pakistani media, supplemented by information from intelligence sources.

Plain clothed officials had entered the building, and urged the people inside to evacuate. But a hand grenade was thrown, injuring two of them and forcing them to retreat. Troops then entered the building and a fierce gun battle ensued. Eleven suspected terrorists were captured and two were killed. After examining the two dead bodies, a female FBI official reportedly exclaimed: "You have killed Khalid Sheikh Mohammad." She then ordered that one of his fingers be cut off and taken away, presumably for DNA testing.

Mohammed's wife and child were taken away to an ISI safe house, where they identified one of the dead bodies as being that of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. After being kept in a private NGO mortuary for 20 days, it was buried in a graveyard in Karachi, under the surveillance of the FBI. However, according to the Asia Times Online, "News of the death of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was intentionally suppressed so that officials could play on the power of his name to follow up leads and contacts."

Then, six months later, Mohammed apparently returned to life, and was reported as having been arrested in Rawalpindi. After spending time in secret CIA prisons, he was moved last year to Guantánamo Bay. He is understood to have been tortured while in U.S. custody, including undergoing "waterboarding."

So what is the truth? Has the "9/11 mastermind" really confessed to his crimes? Or does the U.S. simply have some unfortunate guy of unknown identity in its custody, and they have tortured him into confessing that he is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and that he was the mastermind of 9/11?

Sources:
1) Ed Pilkington, "'I was responsible for 9/11, from A to Z' - a confession from Guantánamo Bay." The Guardian, March 15, 2007.
2) "Shock and scepticism greet alleged 9/11 confessions" The Guardian, March 15, 2007.
3) Syed Saleem Shahzad, "A chilling inheritance of terror." Asia Times Online, October 30, 2002.
4) Syed Saleem Shahzad, "Khalid: A test for US credibility." Asia Times Online, March 6, 2003.
User avatar
faceless Online
Posts: 26472
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:16 pm

Post by faceless »

I wouldn't be surprised if this guy claimed to have stolen Shergar too.
User avatar
janbo1960
admin
Posts: 389
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:12 pm

Post by janbo1960 »

Would any sane person accept the validity of his "confession"???
User avatar
maycm
'cheeky banana'
Posts: 1671
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:47 pm

Post by maycm »

faceless wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if this guy claimed to have stolen Shergar too.
janbo1960 wrote:Would any sane person accept the validity of his "confession"???
My thoughts exactly.

Oh yeah, 9/11 that was me.

London, me

Madrid, me

Challenger space shuttle, Hindenberg, Titanic…..me, me, me...
User avatar
janbo1960
admin
Posts: 389
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:12 pm

Post by janbo1960 »

Dont forget JFK
popinjay
admin
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 2:11 pm

Post by popinjay »

I'd be surprised if waterboarding was all they did to him.
User avatar
major.tom
Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 1970
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 7:07 pm
Location: BC, Canada

Post by major.tom »

After months and years of this, I'd probably confess to anything I could think of too. Did anyone else notice that the only part of his "confession" that was redacted was the question of whether his confession was made under duress.

Duress!?! Torture isn't duress?

If I were a religious man, I would pray to god that the U.S. comes to its senses and realizes that everyone is entitled to due process, not just the "nice criminals."
User avatar
Karl
admin
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:43 pm
Location: Tottenham

Post by Karl »

Independant newspaper
INDEPENDENT - Sun, 18 Mar 2007

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's dramatic confessions before a US military hearing are beginning to backfire on the Bush administration. Legal experts are casting serious doubt about their validity as evidence, and human rights activists say they only illuminate a "sham process" of justice in the US war on terror, including the apparent use of torture on Mohammed and potentially dozens of other al-Qa'ida suspects.

Mohammed's claims to have been fully responsible for the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington, the murder of Daniel Pearl, the 2002 Bali disco bombings and a host of lesser plots, both hatched and fully realised, were made public to great fanfare last week.

Almost immediately, however, legal experts said he appeared to be exaggerating his role for his own self-aggrandisement and may also have deliberately floated false claims to send US investigators on wild goose chases.

The CIA denies that Mohammed was tortured, but evidence to the contrary has been building for years. Two years ago, a CIA official told ABC News that he had been water-boarded, and had won the admiration of his interrogators because it took him two to two-and-half minutes to start confessing - well beyond the average of 14 seconds observed in others.

He apparantly has confessed ro everything including things that happened AFTER he was arrested. And it is probably true that he is in fact a long time dead.
User avatar
Karl
admin
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:43 pm
Location: Tottenham

Post by Karl »

Galloway agreed on his radio show with a caller that he probably died back in 2002
hopefully george will start to see 911 and 7/7 as lies too
Post Reply