EE: What's up with Stacey and Max?
-
Lostinthestates
- Posts: 648
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:44 pm
- Location: Bethlehem, USA
EE: What's up with Stacey and Max?
Ok I have a question to all women here. So Stacey is protecting Max from being caught out by his wife! She clearly wants to be with him! So why is she covering for him? Is this a real stupid story line (that's what it seems to me) or is there some point of the female psyche I do not understand (also very likely :-)! I am curious about your views!
It's not really the female psyche I think as much as the cheating individual's psyche. She knows that if Tanya finds out that Max will be furious and probably end it with her and she doesn't want to take that risk.
Men will do the same thing too. Either way it's just stupid and I am sooooo ready for this storyline to be done.
Men will do the same thing too. Either way it's just stupid and I am sooooo ready for this storyline to be done.
-
Lostinthestates
- Posts: 648
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:44 pm
- Location: Bethlehem, USA
But will Tanya throw him out this time, that's the question. If she does, what's the chance that Max will stay with Stacey?Skylace wrote:It's not really the female psyche I think as much as the cheating individual's psyche. She knows that if Tanya finds out that Max will be furious and probably end it with her and she doesn't want to take that risk.
Men will do the same thing too. Either way it's just stupid and I am sooooo ready for this storyline to be done.
It's too dull for words right now. I would rather have seen Stacey and Bradley go through the ups and downs of their relationship than have this crap going on. When will EE get it right?
cori wrote:NO I DISAGREE! Stacey cannot have Bradster back, I mean geez she's doing his dad, who apparently must be pretty good in the sack. BUT I DO AGREE, let's have an end to this idiotic plot, I'd rather watch Keith picking his toe nails, oh no did I really say that?
While I don't like Stacey shagging her ex's dad I guess they could call it even for him pressuring her into the abortion and they could start over
-
Lostinthestates
- Posts: 648
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:44 pm
- Location: Bethlehem, USA
I think that sounds good! Even though I do not agree with the toe nails ;-)Skylace wrote:cori wrote:NO I DISAGREE! Stacey cannot have Bradster back, I mean geez she's doing his dad, who apparently must be pretty good in the sack. BUT I DO AGREE, let's have an end to this idiotic plot, I'd rather watch Keith picking his toe nails, oh no did I really say that?Yes you did.
While I don't like Stacey shagging her ex's dad I guess they could call it even for him pressuring her into the abortion and they could start over
-
Marcella-FL
- Don't make me pull this van over!!!
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:53 pm
- Location: KMC, Germany
-
Lostinthestates
- Posts: 648
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:44 pm
- Location: Bethlehem, USA
-
misslisalynn
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:26 pm
- Location: Virginia
Her ending up pregnant is the typical way these type of storylines go,YAWN. Just give me Bradley and Stacey back together without a baby being brought into the mix. It isn't like with what they have done to each other in the past would let them have smooth reconsilation anyways. NO MORE BABIES ON THE SQUARE THIS YEAR PLEASE, we already have Honey and Dawn, who next...Pat, Yolande, Peggy, Carly who doesn't even have a boyfriend...oh no it's gonna be Shirley after the one off with Kev! UUGGHH