Clare Short on the Iraq War cabinet meetings

[faceless]

'There was no Cabinet debate in run-up to war,' says Short as Government refuses to release minutes
By Simon Walters
1st March 2009

The Government is refusing to release minutes of Cabinet meetings before the Iraq War because they would reveal there was no discussion on the issue. Details surrounding two crucial meetings on the eve of the conflict were laid bare for the first time yesterday when former Cabinet Minister Clare Short, who was present at both, gave a full account of what happened.

She told The Mail on Sunday the main reason for the ‘scandalous’ decision not to publish the minutes was not to protect confidential discussions about the war, but to cover up the fact there was no such discussion. At the last Cabinet meeting, no debate on the legality of the war was allowed and Tony Blair, then Prime Minister, said brusquely: ‘That’s it.’

The official records would also put an end to claims by Gordon Brown’s supporters that, in private, he had grave doubts about the war, said Ms Short. In fact, he led the Cabinet campaign to accuse France of sabotaging British and American attempts to win United Nations support for the attack on Saddam Hussein.

‘It is extraordinary when you hear people like Jack Straw say that the Cabinet minutes cannot be published because you have to preserve Cabinet confidentiality and robust decision-making,’ said Ms Short, who resigned as International Development Secretary after the war. ‘The bitter irony is that what they are doing is concealing the fact there was no robust decision-making. The minutes will reveal there was no real Cabinet discussion about the Iraq War. That is the real scandal.’

Ms Short spoke out after the Government blocked an order by the Information Commissioner to reveal minutes of Cabinet meetings on March 13 and March 17, 2003, two days before the war started on March 19. She said: ‘Gordon had been completely marginalised in the run-up to the war. It wasn’t because he didn’t support it but because he and Tony were not getting on. Then, John Prescott had a dinner and knocked their heads together.’

The meeting on March 17 was called to discuss Attorney General Lord Goldsmith’s advice on the legality of the war. Ms Short said: ‘When we arrived, there was a piece of paper in front of each of us, a few paragraphs written by the Attorney General saying the war was legal, there were no problems etc. Lord Goldsmith started reading it out but we said, “You don’t have to, we can read it.” Then Tony said something like, “That’s it.” And that was it. I wanted to know if the Attorney General had any doubts about the legality of the war. They all said, “Clare, be quiet, stop.” No one else wanted to talk about it. I was shouted down.’

-------------------------

So why has it taken her so long to speak out about this in public?

[major.tom]

I wondered the same thing. One can only guess that she didn't want to put herself on the line for revealing the content of cabinet discussions and hoped that they would be publicly released. When it became clear that that wouldn't happen, she could no longer sit and wait.

No doubt she could have and (arguably) should have done more. But the same is true of others who are more directly culpable for the illegal invasion of Iraq. At least she's speaking out now, even if it is a day late and a dollar short.