Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 12:29 am
No need to worry about me being some sort of Luddite (!), I used the term “scientific mumble jumble” because most people have no idea if steel can melt in a fuel fire, and so therefore have to rely on the words of “experts”, but as we have seen so far iro of 9/11, dozens of “experts” are produced to support every possible view point, and all have their own expert opinions as to why the “expert opinion” of another expert is always flawed. Basically the Public has been so confused by all these rivalling experts, and for something as abstract & technical as this, even if a majority body of experts agree that a fuel fire could not by itself melt steel, there are bound to be some experts who will throw a confusing spanner in the works by suggesting other factors, even plain boring “unknown factors” that produced the right circumstance for the steel to indeed melt, and so throwing doubt on the issue once again, instead of clearing it up once and for all.
Regarding the prior knowledge, it was not just the Fox news report (New York Times did the same story including the prior knowledge comment) that gives further credence to this, but also the fact that the recording equipment which was seen by witnesses being used to record the first impact, would have taken some time to have set-up before being ready to use, also the spot they positioned themselves, Liberty Park, located directly across the river, offered the clearest and most unobstructed view possible of the World Trade Center. It was the best place to position yourself if you had advance knowledge of an attack and wanted to witness it. Further we have their very bizarre reactions of being “happy” & “high-fiving”, whereas everybody was shocked & subdued. But more to the point, having re-watched the Israeli TV clip, the context of the comment “our purpose was to document the event”, was an answer as to why these guys were where they were, as opposed they were there because of normal circumstances and just happened to be ready to film from a perfect spot !
Regarding the prior knowledge, it was not just the Fox news report (New York Times did the same story including the prior knowledge comment) that gives further credence to this, but also the fact that the recording equipment which was seen by witnesses being used to record the first impact, would have taken some time to have set-up before being ready to use, also the spot they positioned themselves, Liberty Park, located directly across the river, offered the clearest and most unobstructed view possible of the World Trade Center. It was the best place to position yourself if you had advance knowledge of an attack and wanted to witness it. Further we have their very bizarre reactions of being “happy” & “high-fiving”, whereas everybody was shocked & subdued. But more to the point, having re-watched the Israeli TV clip, the context of the comment “our purpose was to document the event”, was an answer as to why these guys were where they were, as opposed they were there because of normal circumstances and just happened to be ready to film from a perfect spot !