Couchtripper

He tricked you. By saying that he had done something 'unethical' and supposedly admitting a slight on his character he then gives credibility to his statement about the hypnosis. Geller has never demonstrated he can hypnotise and hypnotism is actually a very weak affect in any case and not some sort ...

No why would I hate him for his lame magic tricks?

Geller is a pretty crap magician who uses tricks to achieve his effects, which means that he knows he is not a psychic. Fine you might say but he claims to be a psychic and profits from that.

For example in 1992 he took a large sum of money from a ...

Uri Geller's on Sky News just now and he's just said that he hypnotised Jackson at one point to help with a problem he had with food. Geller said that he did something 'totally unethical' and asked Jackson under hypnosis if he'd ever touched a child inappropriately. He says he said no.

Of course ...

I was kind of shocked over the last couple of weeks about how much of a Stalinist he is which to me makes him as bad as the BNP callers.

I can't picture George keeping a caller on every week who said Hitler didn't go far enough or denied Nazi atrocities so after last week where Karl was saying as ...

18 'You knows' on Saturday from the Stalinist windbag although I may have missed a couple.

Is George short of calls so that he has to promote this idiot twice a week?

Does that mean that iTunes make 60% on each sale?

I came across the BNP political broadcast last week and it blew me away.

The fucking irony of trying to sell facism by using the graves of WWII soldiers is unbelievable. They also seem to be entirely unaware of the sacrifices made by the commonwealth like the 1.6 million Indians who died in WWII ...

Should have seen it coming...

There was a show on Radio 4 this week with Clement Freud who was a Liberal MP doing his memoirs and he said that only 4% of people who defeated a sitting MP from one of the two big parties managed to retain it at the next election.

I'm not sure if that stat still stands but it is a truism that ...

No but apparently the decision for GG not to stand was made some time ago at least in September 2007.

You have to admit it's unusual for a sitting MP to try to change constituency.

Why do you think he's doing that? Has he given any reason yet?

So why doesn't he try in Birmingham if that's the case? He'd, by your logic, be almost certain to win there.


It's not a great argument to ask why didn't George stand in the #1 Muslim seat rather than #2 out of 650 but possible reasons might be he didn't want to live in Birmingham, the sitting ...

My belief is not narrow and I never said it was incorrect behavior I'm just pointing out the fun of the nonsense politicians come away with. In George's letter he says that Brown is being cynical about elections.

Top Muslim populations out of the 650 seats in parliament.

Birmingham Sparkbrook ...

I'm seriously suggesting that George would not attempt to fight a seat that didn't have a large Muslim population because of his popularity in that demographic.

He has no history with this constituency just like he didn't at the last one. He's cherry picking rather than defending his current seat ...

faceless wrote:yes, because we all know that Muslims are all just one entity and vote the same.

Ahh sorry it's just an amazing coincidence...